| slaven | 10.07.2018, 09:50 | #322188 |
| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kr3VqsL6HRg
tenisti, to co? ako mohla hlavna rozhodkyna zahlasit 0:40 pre Cibulu, ked ta Cinanka vratila ten uder na jej polovicu a potom prislo jastrabie oko? nechapem co Cibulkova namietala a hadala sa  |
|
| slaven | 10.07.2018, 10:08 | #593996 | |
| pekne reakcie na to video:
. . .akoze hram tenis rekreacne v lete raz do tyzdna, ALE to, ze ma byt nova lopta a nie 0:40, mi je nad slnko jasnejsie. . . profi hracke D.Cibulkovej to jasne nebolo ??? Jej snaha ziskat ten fiftin je nesportove az to boli. . . I am not sure what is to discuss. The referee is incompetent, and Hsieh is right: the point must be replayed. Even if she had not even return the ball after the "out" call, the point must be played again - it was not a point for Cibulkova, for Hsieh has been anyway disturbed by the referee call. Hsieh has had the courage to support a correct viewpoint. |
||
| nuno | 10.07.2018, 10:26 | #593997 | |
| nechala sa uniest verdiktom emipairovej.,aj ked vedela,ze nema pravdu.,bolo to od nej nesportove.,mala sama povedat nova lopta.,ale taketo veci sa stavaju.,aj jej sa to uz stalo a prehrala zapas | ||